Business model generation WITH THE LEADING TOOL

Today being successful is a term, that requires far more than just a good product/service. It requires a winning business model. Creating one, requires one to connect key elements of the business model in a creative and innovate way.

Below we are pointing out 12 key elements of the business model canvas that one should consider:

• Problem – What kind of pain end users are experiencing (without your solution)?
• Solution – How are we successfully and efficiently addressing the pain?
• Unique selling point (USP) – What makes our solution stand out and differ from the competition? 
• Key resources – Which resources are fundamental to competitive advantage creation (eg patents, trademark, company culture, etc.)?
• Channels – Which channels are used for the distribution and communication (costs vs. ability to get feedback).
• Target segments – Which potential end users / clients we are targeting and what their characteristics are?.
• Indicators – What are the prerequisites for the success and how we are going to measure our performance?
• Key partners – Who are our strategic partners (suppliers, end users/clients, creditors, investors).
• Risks – Which risks are key to address and how?
• Revenue sources – How we are going to generate revenues and what will be our pricing policy?
• Cost structure – Which are our costs, what is their nature, what is our break even point, what return is expected? 
• Key activities – Which activities are crucial for us to reach our goals?

Download the BUSINESS MODEL CANVAS for FREE for your use.

Please note that creating a business model canvas is normally only a beginning of the strategic and business planning. Creating a winning business model requires us to dig into details as well, test our assumptions etc. Nevertheless, it makes it extremely easy to agree upon fundamentals and set the healthy & promising starting point.

When designing a business model it is important to understand the nature of market gaps. Thinking in this way will not only boost the probability of your success, but also improve your value added. Success is by no means conditioned by standing out in all elements of the business model. Sometimes it is enough to change only one element. Last but not least, it is often a preferred choice to go niche and address more specific needs. Going general requires more resources and is far more challenging to handle. Normally it is a “big fish” bet.

Business model generation is intertwined with many other questions such as how to find promising end user / client problems and how to successfully address them, how to find and establish a USP, how to raise attention of the target segment, how to maximize your added value, how to know when is the right time for business model changes etc. In case you are open for us to widen your horizons, let us know. We will be glad to work on another interesting case!

More about CORPORATE STRATEGY and BUSINESS PLAN.

The post How to make a winning business model? appeared first on Consilue.

Balanced scorecard makes strategy operational by translating it into performance measures. Operational orientation allows monitoring of the strategy via selected key performance indicators in a simple and easy way (status and change over time).

Balanced scorecard is a great tool to holistically track the execution of a strategy and understand the “causes – consequences”.

The balanced scorecard divides measures into the following interdependent perspectives – innovation, internal processes, customer and financial.

• • Balanced scorecard: Financial
    How is the success of the company seen by shareholders? The measures often relate to the creation of value, share price, market shares, growth rates, profitability margins and returns, liquidity, viability, cost reduction etc.
  • Balanced scorecard: Customers
    How is the company seen by its customers? The measures often relate to the customer needs (new market penetration, developing new products and services), customer satisfaction, customer loyalty etc.
  • Balanced scorecard: Internal processes
    How do people and processes perform? The measures often relate to the improvement of core competencies, improvement of technologies, production excellence, quality management, inventory management, motivating employees etc.
  • Balanced scorecard: Innovation
    What possibilities of development and learning do the employees have? The measures often relate to the key personnel, research and development, continuous improvements etc.

Balanced scorecard should consist out of well defined set of measures. Each one, should be attributed to one or more employees, responsible for its execution. Eventually it would allow better control over the implementation of the strategy and facilitate the elimination of bottlenecks.

Due to the integrity of the balanced scorecard framework, the measures defined provide compliance with the strategy and in no way encourage short-term activities that are harmful to the company in the long term.

In contrast to traditional thinking, the quantitative as well as qualitative measures are set in the balanced scorecard. Defining measures requires that one thinks about the possibility of updating and comparing the results, the degree of reliability, objectivity, appropriate responsible person, current state of the measures etc.

Strategy and the measures defined within the balanced scorecard framework are the base for preparation of other plans, such as marketing and sales plan, financial plan, and operational plan.

Interested in our support linked to strategy consulting ? Please contact us and we will be glad to prepare you an offer!

The post Balanced scorecard – strategic management tool appeared first on Consilue.

Porter’s five forces model provides a better understanding of the industry dynamics.

Industry analysis is one of the crucial elements of the analysis prepared prior to the business model development and other strategic decisions made. Unlike some other more quantitative methods, Porter’s five forces model relies primarily on qualitative assessment.

Porter’s 5 forces model and the industry attractiveness – force: the bargaining power of buyers

Bargaining power of buyers is present when buyers are abusing their power to decrease the purchasing prices, increase the quality, add additional services, etc.

Factors affecting the bargaining power of buyers are:

• Concentration of buyers
• Fragmentation of suppliers
• Alternative sources of supply
• Low switching cost
• The importance of product / service to the customer
• The threat of takeover by the buyer

Michael Porter five forces model and the industry attractiveness – force the bargaining power of suppliers

Bargaining power of suppliers is present when suppliers are abusing their power to raise the selling prices, decrease the quality and dispose the additional services, etc..

Factors affecting the bargaining power of suppliers are:

• Concentration of suppliers
• Fragmentation of customers
• Alternative sources of supply
• High switching cost
• Strong brand of the supplier
• The importance of the transaction to the supplier
• The threat of takeover by the supplier

5 forces model and the industry attractiveness – force the threat of new entrants

The entry of new competitors typically leads to lower profitability of all competitors in the industry.

Factors affecting the threat of new entrants are:

• Initial investment in fixed assets
• Economies of scale
• Experiences
• Access to supply and distribution channels
• Expected retaliation
• Loyalty of customers and suppliers
• Legislation and politics
• Differentiation

Five forces model analysis and the industry attractiveness – force the threat of substitutes

Profitability of the companies operating in the industry is not affected solely by the competition and new entrants, but also by substitutes.

Threat of substitutes involves three dimensions:

• Product for product / service for service substitution
• Substitution of need
• Generic substitution

Porter’s five forces model and the industry attractiveness – force the competitive rivalry

Factors affecting the competitive rivalry are:

• Competitors are in balance
• Low differentiation
• Slow market growth
• High fixed costs in the industry
• High exit barriers

Interested in industry analysis? Please contact us and we will present you the cooperation and our offer!

The post Porter’s five forces model – leading views on industry analysis appeared first on Consilue.

WORLD-LEADING CORPORATES CONTINUALLY SURPRISE US. IN ORDER TO STAY IN THE ELITE THEY COMMUNICATE MORE AND MORE VISIONARY IDEAS. THEIR MARKET CAPITALIZATION IS LARGELY IMPACTED BY THE PERCEIVED SCOPE AND GROWTH OF FUTURE OPERATIONS, SO THE MORE ABSTRACT & DARING THEY ARE, THE MORE INTEREST THEY RAISE AND HIGHER IS THEIR POTENTIAL. THE WINNERS ARE THOSE WHO RISK A LOT, BUT IN A SMART WAY – CASE OF ALPHABET INC.

Alphabet Inc. is a financial holding, the epicenter of creativity and innovation of incredible scope. Google Inc. currently represents the majority of this holding, while other companies are still in relatively early phases of their development. These are Access, Calico, CapitalG, GV, Nest, Verily, Waymo, X and many other projects, which are about to be spin-offs / carve-outs in the near future. The activity focus is on information organization, investment banking, IT infrastructure, biology and aging, healthcare, home management, transport and logistics, television etc.

Already the name (Alphabet Inc.) symbolizes the organization’s mission, placement of so called »alpha bets«. Albert Einstein once said: »The best investment is investment in one’s knowledge.« and it seems that Alphabet Inc. took this statement seriously. They bet more and more intensively on the combination of technology and learning – machine learning and artificial intelligence.

The potential of these two technologies can be well understood from a simple chess experiment. The computer was given the game instructions and develop its own knowledge of playing based on own iterations. In less than 4h of playing the cumulative knowledge already exceeded the amount of cumulative chess knowledge developed by people through centuries of playing this game. Chess is only one of the examples, in reality there are numerous potential applications. Speaking from the monetary perspective, the value of the market is estimated in trillions of US dollars. The two technologies may result in a double digit GDP growth of the world.

We are probably not even aware of the progress that is about to be made in next years. The cumulative knowledge base will get new dimensions, since the knowledge begins to grow at significantly faster pace. Practically, in line with the IT infrastructure development. Inventions such as Quantum computers, however, will speed things up. New knowledge will open the door to a world of completely different life.

A well-known Chinese magnate and businessman, Jack Ma, at one of the public speeches said: “It is more important that you are the first one, than that you do things perfectly.” With this statement he highlights the importance of the »first mover effect«, the entrepreneurs are still under-aware. Not only that Alphabet Inc. is normally among the ground-beakers, its innovation in combination with market dominance actively address also the so-called »trend setting«.

If so far Google Search was considered as the leading tool for searching information on computers, phones, tablets and other media; the company is opening a new, even more promising chapter. With the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning they a targeting a more strategic role in one’s life, becoming personal assistants. This will drastically improve the role Google Inc. plays in our lives and of course simplify our operationally challenging everyday. Despite the fact that Amazon’s Alexa and Apple’s Siri came first and were until recently leading by active users, it appears that the winner of this battle is going to be Google Inc., also due to the cross-product synergies.

Innovation is just a base. In order to make an idea a success story, much more is needed. Among others, also the ability of market penetration. Recall how Google Inc. in the past used not only organic approaches, but also corporate acquisitions to speed up the market integration at just the right time. Today, Android probably would not be so well-known and widely used if Motorola Mobility acquisition would not take place back then ($ 12.5 billion, 2012) and accelerate the penetration. The same applies to the acquisition of Nest Labs (USD 3.2 billion, 2014), which enabled the company to develop its presence in households in the IoT segment; and the acquisition of YouTube ($ 1.7 billion, 2006), which enabled Google Inc. to successfully responded to the transfer of traditional television to the world wide web and significantly increase its advertising potential. Mind also the takeover of the Israeli company Waze ($ 1.15 billion, 2013), which significantly improved the Google Maps with more advanced travel time calculation, suggesting the most optimal routes, etc .; or the acquisition of the HTC Pixel Smartphone Division ($ 1.1 billion, 2017), which strengthened the development team in some critical areas and may seriously jeopardize Apple’s Iphone profit cake. Advanced strategic management and bold thinking result in more than 200 other corporate acquisitions made in the last 10 years – Gradient Ventures and the Google Assistant Investment Program play an increasingly important role.

Alphabet Inc. understands very well how important it is to actively monitor and set trends. People’s habits are changing rapidly all the time, opening up new market opportunities. Being the first in key segments such as machine learning and artificial intelligence opens the door to the potential of enormous value generation in the future. Capital un-intensive business requires management to focus its efforts on growth – thus the tendency to focus on end users, user experience, brand perception, customer loyalty, customer satisfaction, etc.

Past financial figures confirm that the tactics is right. Past growth rates are high (Net sales CAGR2014-17: 18.9%; EBIT CAGR2014-17: 16.6%), which partly also reflects smart allocation of resources and the increasingly active penetration of emerging emerging markets such as India, South Asia, China and others.

Source: Alphabet Inc. Consilue analysis.

Despite impressive financial statements, many investors believe in hidden reserves. The complaints relate to the monetization of solutions, excessive share of more expensive equity in the financial structure, unnecessary exposure with short-term financial investments, etc. As a result, the capital market position of the company is not optimal. Measures of protection against hostile takeovers, such as, the issue of multi-class shares with different management rights, which give the founders the main managing role in the company, additionally worsen the situation.

Source: Alphabet Inc. Consilue analysis.

The chart above shows year-on-year increase in surplus cash »Money and short-term financial investments« (31 Dec 2017: USD 102 billion) and its financing. In other words, a substantial portion of equity is used to invest in US bonds and similar short-term liquid instruments. For some stupidity, for others a masterpiece. The fact is that it is very difficult to judge the situation on limited outer data. One of the theories that advocates the current management’s behavior is that the reasons for the significant surplus should be sought in the context of tax benefits. Companies like Alphabet Inc., Apple Inc., Microsoft Inc., Cisco Inc. and others hold a cumulative 0.5 trillion dollars of surplus cash in their balance sheets. Their bargaining power against the tax regulator is strengthening every year and call for a more favored one-time tax treatment, co called »tax holidays«. They wisely wait for the right moment to come. In times of crisis, the saying »Money is the king.« is well-known.

Critics respond with counter-arguments. One of them, for example, is that Google Inc. is with its balance sheet full of surplus funds becoming an important player in the world of investment banking, a world of sharks. Investor doubt in safety of these funds, due to the company mysterious behavior and (little) amount of attention.

From the value point of view, the lever of Alphabet Inc. (Google Inc.) is not really the amount of excess cash, but rather the ability to invest it in a very smart way. Not only within the technology sector, but also wider. The financial holding has a unique weapon in their hands – Google search queries. The latter can be demonstrated with, for example, comparing the number of Google search queries and the Bitcoin (BTC) price development. The correlation between one and the other is extremely high and, as in many other cases, provides a good basis for investment decision making.

Source: Alphabet Inc. Consilue analysis.

Corporate strategy – it is about our path. How we are achieving our goals. How wide and open we look at things. How capable we are to appropriately address macro trends. How we recognize and manage advantages, weaknesses, opportunities and dangers. How we strengthen purchasing power within the industry. How we make advantage of our corporate competences, competitive advantages, capabilities etc.

Google’s strategic management is in many views exceptional. Advanced future-thinking, technology, innovation and creativity. In everyday life, things are of course much more complex than the chess game, but something is certain. Development goes on with the speed of light. The ideas we have been acquainted with a decade ago in science fiction movies are now part of our everyday life. But ideas are not all, they are only the beginnings. Its the corporate strategy who decides whether they will play an active role in our lives or not. Corporates need to do unique, break-through things. Today we need to think about how the life will look in twenty years. We need to think about the virtual reality, personal assistants, gene modification, molecular designing, personalized medicine, (cell)growing of meat etc. Dare to risk, but in a smart way – just as the leading companies do.

The post Google Inc. – Masters of corporate strategy and hazard appeared first on Consilue.

COMPANIES ARE CREATING VALUE FOR THEIR SHAREHOLDERS IN A MORE AND MORE ORIGINAL WAYS. THEY BET ON VARIOUS THINGS: INNOVATIVE BUSINESS MODELS, ECONOMIES OF SCALE, COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES ETC. APPROACHES DIFFER AND SOME MAY EVEN LOOK STRANGE FOR THOSE THAT DO NOT REALLY HAVE A STRONG FINANCIAL BACKGROUND – CASE OF HOME DEPOT INC.

Company Home Depot Inc. is a US retail giant, selling equipment for home, garden and workshop. Their products and services are sold throughout the network of 2.200+ stores in USA, Canada, Mexico and online. The company is the biggest retailer worldwide in its segment. In financial year 2017 the company generated 101,0 billion USD net sales and 16,5 billion USD EBITDA. More than all non-financial legal entities in a smaller country such as Slovenia, EU.

Why is increasing the financial debt beneficial?

The company operates in a smart way. Part of the success story is linked also to the financial structure and its restructuring. In last years the company is increasing the level of financial debt and decreasing the level of equity. In this way Home Depot Inc. is increasing its Return on equity (ROE). Meaning, the shareholders’ equity is being managed in a more and more efficient way. Let’s look more in details how this is possible.

Development of invested capital and return on equity (ROE) of Home Depot Inc.

Source: Home Depot Inc. Consilue analysis.

Invested capital as at the end of FY 2017 amounts to 28,5 billion USD. Financial debt equals 27 billion USD and shareholder’s equity 1,5 billion USD. One can quickly notice that the indebtedness measured as D/E ratio is »very high«, 1611%. Nevertheless, the ratio as such is not really problematic. The key is to consider the market (not book value) indebtedness ratio. In the case of Home Depot Inc. future returns on invested capital are expected significantly above the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The market value of equity therefore significantly (more than 100x) exceeds its book value, making the healthy debt levels significantly higher.

The more value the company creates, the higher the optimal levels of debt. As the debt levels built, the ease of creating value for shareholders increase. And the system works as a spiral. The more debt there is, the higher the value for shareholders.

Financial debt and debt management

Financing mix with a leverage as in the case of Home Depot Inc also brings challenges. A mistake in managing financing can have serious consequences. Financial debt can quickly show its other face. Proper supervision of risks and stabilization of future cash flow is therefore of crucial importance. Management of Home Depot Inc. is well aware of this fact. They are eager to continuously strengthen the underlying competences. Especially those that influence the increase in gross margin and further development of competitive advantages.

Financial debt is being managed carefully. Risks related to new obligations and danger of eventual liquidity gaps are continuously addressed in a proper way. The majority of debt is of long-term nature. Its maturities match the maturities of underlying projects. The company does not seek to create »fast« profits at the expense of differences in maturities. The company is aware of risks and the fact that this is not really their business.

Table of financial debt as at the end of FY 2017 (m’ USD):

Source: Home Depot Inc. Consilue analysis.

The financial structure is despite the relatively leveraged financial mix, stable. What makes it sustainable is the value that is being created. Additionally, the lenders are also well aware of the fact that the ratio Net debt / EBITDA as at the end of FY 2017 amounts to »only« 1,4x. This fact additionally strengthens the position of the company. It messages that in case of tightening, the financial debt can still be relatively quickly repaid with operational cash flow.

The success story described above still has space to develop further. The debt levels are not yet optimal, meaning that in the area of debt management there is still space for improvements and value creation. Yield to maturity for 10-year bonds is below 5,0%, meaning that eventual increase of debt levels is further improving the weighted average cost of capital.

The developments described are strongly appreciated by the investors. The value of the Home Depot Inc. stock in last 7 years strongly outperformed competitive peer companies. The growth was truly significant, from 30 USD/share to 200 USD/share. Furthermore, the company was also paying out dividends. Compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of the Home Depot Inc. stock in the period that matches FY 2011 – FY 2017 amounts to 28,5%, compared to the 9,6% growth of S&P Retail index.

Chart: Stock price development

Source: Bloomberg. Consilue analysis.

As we see, the financial debt is taking the nature of equity. D.E.B.T. is the magic word or key to a success of Home Depot Inc. The more the indebtedness increases, the more the value increases. On the given case we see how event the financing structure can become the source of value creation for shareholders and even a strategic competitive advantage of a company.

Is value creation in your company addressed in a sufficiently advanced way? Do you know the specifics and best practices that would fit your company best? Does your strategy hide innovative financial & business approaches or you think it is just another block of paper in your drawer? Which strategic decision may hit your competitors next?

The post D.E.B.T. – a success story of a US giant Home Depot Inc. appeared first on Consilue.

TECHNOLOGY BRINGS REVOLUTIONARY CHANGES INTO THE BUSINESSES. IT ENABLES NEW DIMENSIONS OF COST OPTIMIZATION ON ONE SIDE, AND EXTREMELY FAST AND CHEAP EXPANSION ON THE OTHER SIDE. THIS CENTURY IS FOR SMART INVESTORS DEFINITELY A GOLDEN ERA. FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF VALUE CREATION, MEGA INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES ARE SHOWING ON THE INVESTOR RADARS – CASE OF MASTERCARD INC.

Mastercard Inc. is a specialized technology company offering e-payment solutions to banks, governments and others. In other words, clients are offered super-fast network for processing end-users’ transactions. The company philosophy is to simplify and upgrade the payment process. Efforts of the company are built around the main concern – to offer safety and security. The company today has 1,8 billion cardholders around the world, mainly in USA, UK, Canada and Brazil. Their brands MasterCard, Maestro and Cirrus became known as synonym for non-monetary business.

Sustainable achieving of high margins in the long-term

Through decades of operations the company developed key competitive advantages, which guarantee today’s success and include strong brand, high level of trust and global network of partnerships. Strong brand impacts the demand, high level of trust as the element of differentiation enables high profit margins and global network of partnerships results in economies of scale and optimal cost structure of operations.

Financials confirm the superb performance of Mastercard Inc. Market share of the company in 2017 hit 17% (2016: 16%, 2015: 12%), while net sales reached 12,5 billion USD. Business performance is improving as a result of consumption rise and changing consumer habits. In terms of value creation, an important fact is linked to the ability to maintain high and stable margins. EBIT margin for years already exceeds 50,0%.

Chart: Net sales and EBIT developments of Mastercard Inc.

Shareholder value creation is what really counts!

The success story of Mastercard Inc. (or some other company operating in tech-sector) recognized by investors is actually a bit deeper. It is linked to the potential of future value generation, which is significantly impacted also by a relatively low operations growth financing needs.

Technology is an interesting phenomenon. It allows one to reach economies of scale fast and without significant investments in capital expenditures (CapEx) or Operating expenditures (OpEx).

The growth as such for Mastercard Inc. does not represent a significant financing burden (compared to non-tech sector companies). In other words, the operations can expand through the existing solutions and significantly impact the value created. If we additionally take into the account the fact that nowadays still 80% of transactions are in cash and the pace of changing consumer habits, we understand the true value drivers.

How easy it is for Mastercard Inc. to finance its existing operations is obvious even now. Despite the relatively high (16,0%) growth of net sales in 2017, the level of shareholder’s equity remained on the same levels. Net profits were paid out in full. The needs of increasing invested capital were addressed completely with increased levels of financial debt. Despite raising of the financial debt, the indebtedness ratios are actually improving, since the market value of equity increases faster than the financial debt.

Every company has its own specifics of shareholder value creation, so it is important to understand what boosts company value the most!

The CEO of Mastercard Inc. Ajay Banga says: »Our investments are focused on the safety, security and development of solutions that fuel high growth of our business.« He is well aware of the areas of the biggest risks and the biggest opportunities. This fact confirms also recent acquisitions, which are executed with a purpose to expand the capabilities of the company and take over the technical solutions, which are about to present a competitive edge for the company in the future. For example, with acquisition of VocaLink Holdings Limited company gained advanced know-how in the area of real-time account transaction processing; with acquisition of Brighterion, Inc. the company gained the AI technology to better understand the transaction flows and prevent the security and safety gaps.

Companies that continuously create value for shareholders have competitive advantage over competitors and wider, meaning in the industry. In case of Mastercard Inc. we talk about the combination of attractive industry and strong competitive advantages. The company stock outperforms even those with biggest potential, selection of NASDAQ index companies.

Chart: Performance of Mastercard Inc. stock vs NASDAQ index

The thoughts of Mastercard Inc. management are concentrated on the core value driver – company’s growth and securitisation of underlying risks. The tools used are exclusively of technological nature. Technology & competitive advantages are the answer to smart managing of companies in 21st century.

The pace at which the technology is brought into the daily operations is high. It requires introduction of new business models. Preparation of more advanced business strategies. Continuous restructuring of activities. Implementation of creative ideas etc. As a result, the capital market positions of the most active companies are drastically improving. They attract investors. Grow the value for shareholders.

What about you? Are you aware of potential that the technology has in the context of your operations? Do you consider its implementation? Do you know which investments are smart and which actually represent a burden for your company?

What are the other shareholder value creation success stories that we know?

Company Uber offers transportation services and has no cars; Facebook is a media company and creates no content; Alibaba is a trading company with no stocks; Airbnb markets real estate, which are in possession of others etc. All these companies master the technology and its impact on value creation. Technology is revolutionizing the whole industries, which is primarily the cause why many sectors stagnate.

The answer on how to “Uber-ize” many other businesses is hiding the potential for new billionaires!

The post Impact of the technology on the shareholder value creation appeared first on Consilue.

THE LEADING MULTINATIONAL COMPANIES EXPLOIT ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE OF STRATEGIC CORPORATE FINANCE (INCL. VALUE-BASED MANAGEMENT) TO MASTER THEIR DECISION-MAKING. WITH OPTIMAL OPERATIONS THEY BUILD THEIR WAY TO RECOGNIZED MILLION DOLLAR POTENTIALS.

Nowadays we are witnessing a serious competition among companies in the market. The world changes at extremely fast pace. Requires agile, self-learning businesses, flat organizational structures, innovativeness in the whole supply chain and wider, implementation of digital in all processes and many other characteristics, which are nowadays preliminary for the success of corporates. Doing business became complicated in its simplicity, while one of the crucial questions being asked today is “How the right decisions are made in the firm on every level?”

Value-based management became in last two decades the “religion” of the leading corporations around the world. It refers to the theory of corporate finance, focused on shareholder’s value maximization. The value is the only indicator that reflects information in a complete, comprehensive and non-biased way. What is more, value added approach enables one to address all processes and stakeholders in a simple way, with one single number.

»The only relevant KPI for owners is the value of their equity share.«

Value-based management – GOOD PRACTICE?

One of the cases where good practice of value-based management is present is Sika Group, a chemical producer giant with HQs in Switzerland. This multinational has 200 companies around the world and is present in 101 countries. It generates 6,25 bn CHF net sales and constantly brings 25%-30% return on invested capital (ROIC). Added value per employee is 115.000+ CHF. Under the umbrella brand Sika, 850+ product brands are promoted. The company persistently grows, organically and with M&As. Only in 2017 the company executed 7 acquisitions and registered 74 patents. And why this multinational is so successful? Definitely also thanks to strategic choice that EVA (Economic Value Added) analysis are performed for every strategically important decision being made.

Let’s look at the business of this multinational from another perspective. Sika Group is a collection of projects. Every project has its own returns and risks. Resources are limited, so decisions are rational. There is nothing wrong with the projects with relatively modest return, if very little is being risked. Also there is nothing wrong with high risks, if high returns are expected. To sum up, the company makes their decisions in line with the value generation and promotes those projects where most value is added with the underlying risks considered.

VBM decision-making in practice

Demonstration of value-based management findings in case of Turkish company acquisition (graphic is symbolic; numbers are not actual):

Commentary of value-based management findings: Acquisition of Turkish company generates significant economic value added (chart: 195 mio CHF). Management proceeds with the execution of the acquisition, since ΣEVA (PV) is positive and in terms of relative project performance among the Tier I projects.

Demonstration of value-based management findings in case of new production line implementation (graphic is symbolic; numbers are not actual):

Commentary of value-based management findings: Purchase of production line for the penetration of selected developed markets with new products is not confirmed, since this decision, due to the relatively low profitability, destroys the value for shareholders (chart: -5 mio CHF). Management seeks alternative business opportunities.

As it can be seen from the two examples above, understanding of the economic value added is simple. This is making value-based management a desired approach for the decision-making. Furthermore, it is a uniformed system, that clearly prioritizes best projects and thus defines priorities of the company. The approach makes sure that the company does the right things first and only then the efficiency of making these right things is considered. In this way the comparison of short-term, mid-term and long-term choices is simplified; only top-notch investments are preferred; allocation of resources is improved; transparency of operations is better etc.

Value-based management is due to its advanced nature more and more often also referred to as smart management tool. It leverages all the knowledge of the capital markets in combination with advance analysis of operations, industry and market opportunities. It helps companies strengthen their relative power. In the long term, using value-based management means heading the optimal way forward, heading in the direction of success. The advantages of value-based management are well understood by the leading multinationals, this is way value-based decision-making is their preferred approach for quite some time already.

The post How to do business to make more for yourself? VBM in practice. appeared first on Consilue.

Optimal capital structure (often also referred as or optimal financing mix) is one of the basic things required for a sound business. It refers to the way how companies finance their assets, how much it costs them and what they risk with it. Generally speaking, we talk about payables financing (suppliers), debt financing (banks) and equity financing (shareholders).

Corporate finance theory often addresses financing through weighted cost of capital (WACC), signaling the minimum level of return on assets engaged for which the economic value of the company is not being destroyed. For a perfect capital mix, the WACC is the lowest and the value for shareholders is maximized.

Financing mix: Balancing debt – equity

The chart presenting WACC in relation to the D/E ratio is U-shaped. Right part of the curve (area where the D/E ratio is above the optimal levels) is much steeper than the left part, signaling the fact that being too indebted is a bad decision to make.

The risk-taking of creditors is by its nature normally limited and therefore the financing is relatively attractively charged … at least as long the company indebtedness is in the healthy zone. When the company bridges that zone, the creditors start demanding higher collateral, decreasing the days of receivables outstanding, seeking to securitize receivables with third parties and increase the prices of goods sold, increasing the interest rates for refinancing activities etc. In this phase the company is already operating on the edge, risking increased illiquidity threats.

Optimal debt level is a relative term

Interestingly, levels of a sound financial debt globally significantly varies and is very much correlated with the 1) attractiveness of the region for the investors and investment flows as well as 2) growth potential. As expected, the highest debt levels are in developed countries such as USA and Western European countries (roughly 60% D/E ratio; 7x-8x Financial obligations / EBITDA ratio), followed by the developing Latin American countries, China, African & Middle East countries (roughly 50% D/E ratio; 6x-7x Financial obligations / EBITDA ratio) and relatively poorly indebted Eastern European countries and India (roughly 40% D/E ratio; 3x-4x Financial obligations / EBITDA ratio).

Almost half of the companies globally operate without or with minimal (<10%) financial debt and from that perspective do not exploit their full value maximization potential. On the other side, the debt of larger companies is often above the industry averages, transforming the debt into the strategical competitive advantage. In this context, we sometimes also see marginal leverage buyouts (LBOs) cases, that due to the leveraged nature and long-time periods often generate some value on the debt side.

Access to the right financial resources is crucial

Financing resources are the prerequisite for the company to operate as well as grow – organically (i.e. own investments in PPE) or inorganically (i.e. through M&A). When the company is growing at a fast pace and the business is either working capital intensive or PPE investment intensive, the company needs to be able to sufficiently provide new sources of equity as well. Generally acceptable is that the more mature the company is, the easier it is to find, maintain and optimize the financial resources. Companies in the early stages of development therefore often need to seek the seed and venture capital, since their risks are simply too high for the standard and risk-averse (not risk-loving) creditors. Furthermore, also companies in the early and mid-developing phase with high growth potential often come across liquidity problems, if they are not efficiently gathering their financial resources.

Equity financing is on one side most exposed to risks, but on the other side also unlimited upwards in terms of reward, since all the potential profits go to shareholders.

To sum up things, in terms of value for shareholders, a sound mix is preferable. Liabilities (payables financing & debt financing) help the company to exploit the full potential of value generation, while equity normally serves as a buffer.

Despite the fact that most successful companies in the last decade generated their value mostly through digitalization and non-asset intensive growth, the financing structure overall is not losing on its importance. Quite opposite, the market is becoming more competitive, leaving less & less space for errors and non-optimal financing structure.

The post Importance of optimal capital structure appeared first on Consilue.

The post CRM tools & philosophy appeared first on Consilue.

The post Takeover defenses appeared first on Consilue.